The pre-dismissal meeting, known in French as the entretien préalable au licenciement (pre-dismissal interview), is a pivotal and often dreaded moment for both employees and employers. As the first concrete step in a contract termination initiated by the employer, this meeting is strictly regulated by the French Code du travail (Labour Code) to guarantee that everyone's rights are respected. Whether you are an employee looking to defend your rights or an employer striving to follow a rigorous procedure, understanding the exact steps of this meeting is essential to navigate this process calmly and in full compliance.
---
The entretien préalable is not a mere administrative formality; it is a fundamental guarantee of French labour law. It addresses a constitutional principle of respecting the rights of the defence.
According to Article L. 1232-2 of the Code du travail, an employer who plans to dismiss an employee must, before making any decision, summon the individual to a pre-dismissal meeting. This rule applies to all dismissals on personal grounds (whether disciplinary or non-disciplinary). For economic redundancies, the obligation also exists (Article L. 1233-11 of the Code du travail), except in the case of certain large-scale collective redundancies with a majority agreement where the procedures may differ.
The pre-meeting has a dual legal objective:
The employer is strictly forbidden from making a final decision or announcing it during the meeting. This moment must remain an open space for discussion and adversarial debate.
---
The validity of the dismissal procedure depends on scrupulous compliance with precise chronological steps. The slightest misstep can lead to the procedure being reclassified as "irregular" before the Conseil de prud'hommes (French labour tribunal).
```
[Summons Letter] ---> (Waiting period: 5 working days) ---> [Pre-Dismissal Meeting] ---> (Waiting period: 2 working days) ---> [Notification Letter]
```
The employer must send a summons letter, known as the lettre de convocation, either by lettre recommandée avec accusé de réception (LRAR - registered mail with acknowledgement of receipt) or by hand delivery against a signed receipt (Article L. 1232-2).
This letter must mandatory mention:
A minimum period of 5 jours ouvrables (working days) must be respected between the delivery of the registered letter or its hand delivery and the day of the meeting (Article L. 1232-4).
Note on the calculation: The day of hand delivery or the first presentation of the registered letter does not count. Sundays and public holidays do not count either. If the deadline expires on a Saturday or Sunday, it is extended to the next working day.
On the day of the meeting, the discussion generally revolves around three phases:
1. The Employer's Statement: The employer (or their representative) clearly outlines the alleged facts or the economic reasons leading them to contemplate dismissal.
2. The Employee's Explanations: The employee presents their version of the facts, provides context, disputes the accusations, or justifies their actions.
3. The Closing: The employer takes note of the remarks and reiterates that the final decision has not yet been made and will be notified later.
---
The entretien préalable is not a closed-door meeting where you must stand alone, but the list of people authorised to attend is strictly limited by law to prevent an imbalance of power.
The employee has the right to be assisted during the meeting (Article L. 1232-4). The rules differ depending on whether there are employee representative bodies within the company:
The employer may be represented by a member of the staff who has the authority to hire or fire (such as the Human Resources Director or a department head).
They may also be assisted by a person belonging to the company's staff. However, the employer cannot be assisted by an external lawyer or a commissaire de justice (bailiff, formerly huissier) during this meeting. Doing so would make the procedure irregular by creating an intimidating atmosphere.
---
French labour law is a system of high precision. Here are the essential figures and deadlines to remember:
---
> Example: Pierre, an IT technician, receives his dismissal summons by hand on Tuesday, November 5.
> * The day of delivery (Tuesday 5) does not count.
> * The 5 full working days are: Wednesday 6, Thursday 7, Friday 8, Saturday 9 (a working day), and Monday, November 11 (a public holiday, which does not count). The fifth day is therefore Tuesday, November 12.
> * The pre-dismissal meeting cannot take place before Wednesday, November 13. If the employer had scheduled the meeting for Tuesday 12, the procedure would be deemed irregular, giving Pierre the right to a maximum indemnity of 1 month's salary.
> Example: Sofia is a manager in a logistics company, earning a monthly salary of €3,200. Her employer makes a procedural error by failing to mention the address of the town hall where the list of conseillers du salarié can be found in the summons letter (since the company has no CSE).
> Sofia takes her case to the Conseil de prud'hommes. The judges find the procedure irregular. The employer is ordered to pay Sofia an indemnity for procedural irregularity amounting to €3,200 (equivalent to one month's salary), in addition to any potential damages for dismissal without real and serious cause if the grounds of the dismissal are also successfully challenged.
---
For both parties, the pre-dismissal meeting is a legal minefield. Here are the most common mistakes to avoid at all costs:
---
In principle, the entretien préalable must take place with the physical presence of both parties. However, the case law of the Cour de cassation (French Supreme Court) exceptionally allows the use of videoconferencing if specific circumstances justify it (significant geographical distance, health crisis) and if the employee's rights (specifically the right to be assisted) are fully guaranteed and preserved.
Being on sick leave (arrêt de maladie) does not suspend the dismissal procedure. The employer can validly summon the employee. If the employee cannot attend due to their health condition, they can request a postponement, but the employer is not legally obliged to accept it. The employer can proceed with the procedure as long as the summons was sent in accordance with the rules.
Yes, absolutely. The conseiller du salarié (or the employee representative) who assists the employee has the right to take notes and write a written report (compte-rendu) of the meeting. This document, signed by the assistant, holds strong evidentiary value before the Conseil de prud'hommes if the statements made during the meeting are disputed.
No. Recording a pre-dismissal meeting without the other party's knowledge is considered an unfair practice. Such an audio recording is inadmissible as evidence before civil and labour courts. Furthermore, it may constitute a violation of privacy.
---
Legal information for guidance only, not personalised legal advice. For your specific situation, ask your question free of charge on AvocatAI — answers based on French law, in your language.